Carbon dating debunked to dating japanese
The theoretical limit for C-14 dating is 100,000 years using AMS, but for practical purposes it is 45,000 to 55,000 years.
If dinosaur bones are 65 million years old, there should not be one atom of C-14 left in them.
Dinosaurs are not dated with Carbon-14, yet some researchers have claimed that there is still Carbon-14 in the bones. Do these data indicate that a more accurate method needs to be derived?
What solutions are available for increasing accuracy of the tests? From the source linked above: Carbon-14 is considered to be a highly reliable dating technique.
In particular, it is implausible that it would have been considered worthwhile to try to use radiocarbon dating methods on these bones, since the rocks that they were taken from were determined to be 99 million years old, as shown in this paper by Kowallis et al.
Now, it is known that $^\text$ decays at a fast enough rate (half-life ~6000 years) for this dating method to be absolutely useless on such samples. would not have been able to obtain this sample, had they been honest about their intent.
Clearly proper sample decontamination procedures are of particular importance in the dating of very old artifacts It is clear that the sample provided by Miller did not under go any 'sample decontamination procedures' at all, and it is therefore strongly questionable to which extent it can be used to obtain a good estimate of the age of the bones.
Furthermore, it appears less than certain that the carbon found in the bones actually had anything to do with them being dinosaur bones.
That included protecting the samples, avoiding cracked areas in the bones, and meticulous pre-cleaning of the samples with chemicals to remove possible contaminants.The preferred method of dating dinosaur fossils is with the radiometric dating method.And the result of this accepted method dates dinosaur fossils to around 68 million years old. Its half-life ($t_$) is only 5,730 years—that is, every 5,730 years, half of it decays away.This, of course, raises some ethical questions, but let's brush these aside for now.
We proceed with the examination of the research done by Miller and his fellow researchers from the CRSEF.
The age that these groups claim to find is usually on the order of thousands or tens of thousands of years old.